The Unsung Heroes: The Power and Influence of Followers in Leadership
- Christopher McCormick
- Sep 2, 2025
- 8 min read
Updated: Sep 26, 2025
Exploring the dynamics of followers in leadership is a fascinating topic that challenges the conventional narrative where leaders receive most of the credit. While we often celebrate those in the spotlight, it's time to recognize the critical role that followers play in shaping outcomes and influencing leaders - these unsung heroes whose contributions often go unnoticed but without whom true leadership could not exist.

Redefining What It Means to Follow
When I was just starting my career, I worked with a brilliant executive named Benita. Everyone knew her name - she was the face of our division, the one who presented at company meetings and whose signature appeared on important documents. But what few people realized was that behind Benita stood Rama, her "right hand" who never sought recognition.
Rama wasn't passive or subservient - far from it. He challenged Benita's thinking, offered alternative perspectives, and often refined her ideas into their final form. When Benita received accolades for a particularly successful initiative, she would always say, "This was Rama’s idea that I simply helped implement."
This experience taught me that being a follower doesn't mean being passive or unimportant. The term "follower" often carries a stigma, conjuring images of blind obedience or lack of initiative. But effective followers are active participants who contribute insights, provide crucial support, and sometimes even guide their leaders toward better decisions.
In fact, without Rama’s willingness to play this role - to be brilliant without requiring the spotlight - many of the division's most innovative ideas would never have materialized. His influence shaped outcomes just as much as Benita’s leadership did.

The Hidden Figures Behind Great Achievements
Perhaps one of the most powerful examples of influential followers comes from NASA's history. Three brilliant African-American women at NASA -- Katherine Johnson, Dorothy Vaughan and Mary Jackson -- served as the brains behind one of the greatest operations in history: the launch of astronaut John Glenn into orbit, a stunning achievement that restored the nation's confidence, turned around the Space Race and galvanized the world.
Their talent and contributions were overlooked due to race and gender, but their perseverance, collaboration, and brilliance were essential for progress. The public never saw them as the leaders of the United States journey into space. That recognition was often given to white men. And yet, the US and NASA would not be what they are today without these women's contributions.
Given September is Hispanic Heritage Month, I thought I'd pull out another hidden figure who made significant contributions to the space program. Albert Baez was a physicist and father of musicians Joan Baez and Mimi Farina. Albert Baez was a Mexican-American scientist whose contributions were groundbreaking but historically overlooked.
He co-invented the X-ray reflection microscope, which significantly advanced the field of X-ray optics.
While not directly a NASA employee, his work in physics was foundational to the advancement of science and technology in the U.S. space age.
Standing in the Wings: A Personal Journey
For those of you who know me, you know I went to a Conservatory for Theatre as part of my undergrad degree. I grew up on stage. I’d been performing in front of the stage lights for as long as I could remember. I was “an actor”. Well, much to my disappointment, the training in my Conservatory required that as part of the program, you would be finding what it was like to sit in each and every part of what makes the theatre so magical. Actors would take on being stage-managers, costume designers, set and lighting designers, etc. And the “Techie’s” would have to do their stint on stage in front of the lights, lines memorized and playing their part to bring the story to life where they usually would be behind the scenes. My first chance to switch it up was as a stage-manager.
What I discovered changed my perspective forever. From my position in the wings, I witnessed the intricate dance of collaboration that made the production possible. I coordinated scene changes, managed props, and supported actors when they forgot lines. When our lead actress froze during opening night, it was my whispered encouragement and quick problem-solving that helped her recover and deliver a stunning performance.
After the show, she received a standing ovation. No one saw my contribution, but I knew - and she knew - that without my support from the wings, that moment of triumph might never have happened. The director later told me, "You were the heartbeat of this production. The audience never saw you, but everyone on stage felt your presence."
That experience taught me something profound: sometimes the most meaningful impact comes from positions outside the spotlight. The joy of contributing to something larger than yourself doesn't always require public recognition.
This lesson has guided my approach to both leadership and followership throughout my career. There is power and purpose in supporting others' success, in being the person who makes things possible rather than the one who takes the bow.
The Connectors Who Amplify Leadership

I once attended a conference where Rosa Parks was being honored. While listening to the tributes, I was struck by something often overlooked in her story. Parks is frequently portrayed as a solitary figure who sparked the Montgomery Bus Boycott through her individual courage. The reality was far more complex and powerful.
Parks was embedded in a network of civil rights activists who had been planning for such a moment. Her action was supported by a community of followers who amplified her message, organized the boycott, and sustained it for 381 days. Without this network of dedicated supporters connecting her act to wider systems of action, her individual courage - remarkable as it was - might not have created lasting change.
The Psychological Foundation of Effective Following
Last year, I mentored a young professional named Brendan who was frustrated in his role. "I feel like I'm just following orders," he told me. "I want to lead something."
We discussed what it meant to be an effective follower. I shared research showing that followers enhance a leader's effectiveness through support and feedback. We talked about how empowered followers can challenge leaders, leading to better decision-making and innovation.
"The most valuable person on my team," I told him, "isn't the one with the most authority but the one who makes everyone else better through their support, feedback, and willingness to challenge assumptions.”
A few months later, Brendan shared that he'd completely changed his approach. Rather than focusing on getting a leadership title, he concentrated on being an exceptional follower - offering constructive feedback, supporting team members, and respectfully challenging ideas when necessary.
"The strange thing is," he said, "now people are starting to look to me for guidance. By being a better follower, I've somehow become more of a leader."
Brendan's experience reflects what psychological studies have consistently shown: leadership and followership aren't opposing concepts but complementary roles that often blend and shift depending on context.

Research from the Journal of Leadership Studies shows that follower engagement can lead to higher organizational performance, with effective followers contributing significantly to team success through these key behaviors.
The Shifting Balance of Power
During a recent client project, I witnessed something remarkable. Our team had no designated leader - instead, leadership shifted naturally based on who had the most relevant expertise for each phase of the project. Sometimes I led, sometimes I followed, and this fluid exchange created some of the most innovative work of my career.
This experience reflects a broader shift in how we understand leadership today. Modern models emphasize shared leadership, where followers and leaders collaborate more equally. The traditional hierarchy with a single leader directing passive followers is giving way to more dynamic, collaborative approaches.

Technology has accelerated this shift. Social media and digital platforms have changed the dynamics, enabling followers to have a voice and influence that was previously unimaginable. Ideas can now spread from anywhere in an organization, not just from the top, creating new pathways for influence and impact.
The Courage to Support Rather Than Shine
One of the most profound leadership lessons I ever received came from an unexpected source. Early in my career, I worked alongside Sofia, a brilliant colleague who consistently declined promotions to leadership positions despite being repeatedly offered them.
Confused by her choices, I finally asked her why. Her answer has stayed with me for decades: "I've discovered that my greatest impact comes not from being the person making announcements, but from being the person making things possible. I can shape more outcomes, influence more decisions, and mentor more people in this role than I ever could with a leadership title."
Sofia’s wisdom echoed what leadership expert Peter Drucker once observed about effective organizations: "The leaders who work most effectively, it seems to me, never say 'I.' They don't think 'I.' They think 'we'; they think 'team.'" Sofia understood that leadership isn't about position but about impact - and sometimes the greatest impact comes from supporting others rather than seeking the spotlight.

Her approach required tremendous courage - the courage to let others receive credit, to find fulfillment in contribution rather than recognition, and to measure success by outcomes rather than titles. This form of courage is rarely celebrated but is essential for any group's success.
Finding Your Place in the Leadership Dance
I recently had lunch with a former colleague who was struggling with career direction. "I feel like I should want to be CEO someday," she confessed, "but I'm not sure that's really where I'd make my best contribution."
We talked about how leadership and followership exist on a spectrum, not as binary choices. I shared how some of the most influential people I've known never held the highest titles but shaped outcomes through their support, insight, and behind-the-scenes influence.
"The question isn't whether you should lead or follow," I asserted. "It's about finding where your unique combination of talents creates the most value - sometimes that's at the front of the room, sometimes it's behind the scenes, and often it's somewhere in between."
She later told me this conversation freed her to pursue a role as a chief of staff - a position where she could leverage her exceptional organizational and interpersonal skills to amplify a leader's effectiveness while having significant influence on strategic direction. "I'm not the face of the organization," she said, "but I'm part of its brain and heart."
The Symphony of Leadership and Followership
Leadership is not a solo performance but a symphony, with each person playing their part. The conductor may be visible at the front, but without the orchestra, there would be no music. And within that orchestra, each musician must both lead their section and follow the conductor, creating harmony through this delicate balance.

As we reflect on our own roles in the organizations and communities we serve, perhaps it's time to reconsider how we value the act of following. Effective following requires courage, judgment, and commitment - qualities we typically associate with leadership. By recognizing and valuing these contributions, we create spaces where everyone can contribute their best, regardless of title or position.
Whether you find yourself leading from the front or supporting from behind, remember that both roles are essential to success. The most effective organizations and movements throughout history have succeeded not because of exceptional leaders alone, but because of the powerful partnership between those leaders and the unsung heroes who followed them - challenging when necessary, supporting when crucial, and always contributing their unique talents to the shared mission.
In the end, perhaps the distinction between leading and following matters less than how we show up in either role - with integrity, courage, and a commitment to something larger than ourselves. That is the true power of both leadership and followership: the ability to create impact that extends far beyond what any individual could accomplish alone.




Comments